From: Harvey Newstrom (mail@HarveyNewstrom.com)
Date: Tue Aug 20 2002 - 12:44:14 MDT
On Tuesday, August 20, 2002, at 01:07 pm, Lee Daniel Crocker wrote:
>> (Michael Wiik <mwiik@messagenet.com>):
>>
>> That is, I see a libertarian utopia as either solitary (where we each
>> exist in different universes) or highly chaotic and unstable (anything
>> goes).
>
> You say "chaotic and unstable" as if those are bad things. Only dead
> things are stable. Life is chaos, uncertainty, risk. If your "utopia"
> is safe and clean and easy, I'll have no part of it.
Whoa! I assume this is over-stated. Are you saying that
safe/clean/easy is unlikely, is dangerous, has side-effects, is too
boring, or what? A blanket statement that you reject safe/clean/easy
solutions seems to merit further explanation. If something were really
simple/safe/clean/easy, why would you reject it?
-- Harvey Newstrom, CISSP <www.HarveyNewstrom.com> Principal Security Consultant <www.Newstaff.com>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:16:17 MST