Re: The "other" side of 29.....

From: Edwin Evans (ektimo@pacbell.net)
Date: Tue Aug 13 2002 - 21:53:31 MDT

Next message: Colin Hales: "RE: Popper, PCR, and Bayesianism (was group based judgment)"
Previous message: Clinton Alexander: "RE: The 2005 PC: Quantum Leap?"
In reply to: E. Shaun Russell: "Re: The "other" side of 29....."
Next in thread: Harvey Newstrom: "Re: The "other" side of 29....."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

E. Shaun Russell wrote:

> Congratulations! As I recall, there are a number of extropes who have
> their birthdays in the next couple of weeks or so...

Starting Thursday, I myself shall be perching precariously on neither
side of 29 :)

Edwin Evans

---
For people who say...
1. "There's 2 sides to every story" - You lose 2 credibility points 
(since "both" sides are almost always wrong)
2. "I'm 100% certain that [x]" - You lose 3 credibility points.
---

Next message: Colin Hales: "RE: Popper, PCR, and Bayesianism (was group based judgment)"
Previous message: Clinton Alexander: "RE: The 2005 PC: Quantum Leap?"
In reply to: E. Shaun Russell: "Re: The "other" side of 29....."
Next in thread: Harvey Newstrom: "Re: The "other" side of 29....."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:16:04 MST