Re: globalization of fear

From: CurtAdams@aol.com
Date: Tue Aug 13 2002 - 16:41:58 MDT


In a message dated 8/13/02 12:16:33, mail@HarveyNewstrom.com writes:

>We want American POWs treated well under the Geneva convention, but
>insist that our prisoners are exempt from those rules.

Originally requested, then backed down on.

>We want other
>nations subject to the World Court and their soldiers tried for
>atrocities, but insist that our soldiers be exempt.

Actually we were insisting UN soldiers be exempt.

>We insist that
>criminals be extradited to the US for trial, but won't extradite our
>citizens to other countries for trial.

I have certainly heard of US citizens being extradited.

>We want all wars officially
>declared and for nations to cooperate with war efforts, but insist that
>our war does not need to be declared by congress and we won't cooperate
>with other nations.

Since when has the US objected to undeclared war? 1941?

>We want our borders to be sacrosanct, but insist
>that we be allowed to infiltrate other countries and assassinate our
>enemies without notifying the country.

Currently we're only doing that in Afghanistan - with their
government's permission. I'll agree dumping
missles about is a bad thing, but, again, not in this round.

>We demand that our citizens
>receive basic rights to council and trial, and public disclosure both in
>our country and abroad, but we deny those same rights to citizens of
>other countries. We demand that evidence against our citizens be made
>public and that the accused has a right to cross-examine any of it, but
>we insist that our evidence is secret and the accused have no right to
>know of their charges.

The one thing I did disagree with.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:16:03 MST