Re: What is going on here?

From: Mike Lorrey (mlorrey@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Aug 05 2002 - 12:43:40 MDT


--- Adrian Tymes <wingcat@pacbell.net> wrote:
> Damien Broderick wrote:
>
> > But here's an even more interesting one, allegedly
> using Mach's Principle
> > to generate weird fluctuating gravity states
> convenient for propulsion:
> >
> > http://www.inetarena.com/~noetic/pls/woodward.html
>
>
> Saw a few points of confusion in there, for
> instance:
> * Apparent confusion of weight with mass at a few
> points.
> * Leaving out a few stages of the cycle (check the
> Figure 6 image:
> shows the transducer expanding and contracting,
> but doesn't show what
> happens to the whole system when the mass, or
> that which causes the
> mass, shifts from one end to the other).
>
> Which isn't to say the entire subject is bunk, just
> that this particular
> explanation of it seems to go nowhere.

Prof John Cramer of U of W has written about a
relativistic loophole in Mach's Principle, in that the
mass of objects change with velocity, so any device
that properly uses any size mass and changes it's
velocity into and out of the 0.9C+ range will exhibit
a measurable thrust. Sasha Chislenko agreed that this
was theoretically solid.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:15:54 MST