From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Tue Jul 30 2002 - 22:46:42 MDT
At 12:25 AM 7/31/02 -0400, Harvey wrote:
>When picking out
>juries, we are more concerned with the defendant's right to a jury of
>their peers.
True, but perhaps it tends to produce a jury of their inferiors or at least
of their most dazed and compliant peers.
>In the case where the defendant doesn't want a particular
>juror, we err on the side of dismissing the juror.
But doesn't the prosecution also have a number of challenges, which they
also use to mediocritize the final set?
Damien Broderick
[everything I know about US law I learned from John Grisham conspiracy
movies and THE PRACTICE]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:15:47 MST