From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Mon Jul 29 2002 - 19:24:49 MDT
>> Wow! While I don't know what "D.C. Offenses" means (do you?),
>> the rest are indeed crimes in my book. But as I said earlier,
>> that doesn't matter so much as the fact that these individuals
>> were convicted.
>I believe that "D.C. Offenses" are probably the total of violations
>of Washington, D.C. laws
Someone else might have addressed this (I'm in a very different time zone),
but it appears to refer to (as it were, second-order) crimes committed
while in prison. I'm pretty sure Howard Roark would run up a few of these
if they stuck him in jail for blowing up public property, then tried to
tell him what to do, as I believe happens occasionally in jail.
Damien Broderick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:15:46 MST