Re: MicroSoft as Slave Master?

From: Harvey Newstrom (mail@HarveyNewstrom.com)
Date: Mon Jul 29 2002 - 06:09:21 MDT


On Sunday, July 28, 2002, at 04:46 pm, John K Clark wrote:

> "Charles Hixson" <charleshixsn@earthlink.net> Wrote:
>
>> prisons are just one place on the edge of society, and the
>> people there are basically the same as the people everywhere else.
>
> I don't believe that for one instant.

I what way do you think prisoners are *not* basically the same as the
people everywhere else?

>> Slavery has always made people more violent.
>
> Probably a lot of truth in that, after all if it's not the environment
> then
> it must be the genes, but from the point of view of prisons it's all
> irrelevant. Knowing the reason a man turned into a monster does not
> change
> the fact that he is in fact a monster and the prison system must deal
> with
> the resulting creature.

Are you implying that criminals are genetically disposed to be
criminals? Your statements sound like you think criminals are a genetic
subspecies of human. And what do the genes have to do with slavery? Do
you thinks slaves were genetically different than masters, or that
slaves were bred in such a way as to become more violent? You seem to
be linking slavery to genetics and to criminal behavior. What exactly
are you talking about?

--
Harvey Newstrom, CISSP		<www.HarveyNewstrom.com>
Principal Security Consultant	<www.Newstaff.com>


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:15:45 MST