From: Amara Graps (amara@amara.com)
Date: Tue Jul 23 2002 - 01:54:35 MDT
Regular Expression:
>The brilliance of Michio Kaku is not in the volume of his scientific
>output (by which I take it you mean research), but in his ability to
>explain the cutting edge of theoretical physics to a reader of average
>intelligence.
I can't judge Kaku's writing because I've not read it. I can't
judge Kaku's scientific papers because I've not read those either,
nor can I judge his abilities as a teacher.
I was questioning Kaku's 'brilliance' because of his particular
activism. (that's why I gave those Google links) To me, that spoke
volumes about him (what he said, how he went about it, etc),
and I had no interest in looking at other output from him.
Amara
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:15:38 MST