From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Mon Jun 17 2002 - 08:42:55 MDT
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 08:41:34PM -0400, Smigrodzki, Rafal wrote:
>
> Some time ago I had an idea which should help: make electrodes in the shape
> of pigtails, or helical springs. This shape would anchor the electrode much
> better and it would allow it to accomodate the stretching and shrinking that
> our brains undergo as we age.
Sounds like a good idea. But what about the dimensions? If you want
to stimulate cortex, you will likely want to do it in layer IV, so
you have around 1.5-3 mm of cortex to screw through. If the helix
has a small radius it will essentially be like current electrodes.
If the radius is larger it will fix better but also affect more
tissue, which might be bad, and you cannot put the electrodes much
closer. There is likely some optimal size here, but you have to
test it experimentally on tissue to find it.
> Another element would be small areas on the
> electrodes covered with a dried, tissue-compatible plastic gel - after
> implantation the gel would take up water and swell into small beads, firmly
> anchoring the electrode. The helical part of the electrode would extend
> through the subarachnoid space (again allowing for movements of the brain
> within the cranium, as in running and under acceleration) to chips attached
> to the dura, with the circuitry for sending information in and out through
> the skin (the current Dobelle implant contains a pedestal open to the
> outside, traversing the skin, which in practice could pose the risk of
> infection).
You can also cover the electrode with tissue attractive protein
chains or glucoproteins.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:14:51 MST