Re: What's So New in a Newfangled Science?

From: Jef Allbright (Groups@jefallbright.com)
Date: Sun Jun 16 2002 - 23:44:07 MDT

Next message: spike66: "Re: Practical Cosmology Symposium--Five Papers Now Online"
Previous message: Emlyn O'regan: "RE: Nothing (was: RE: Changing One's Mind)"
In reply to: Hal Finney: "Re: What's So New in a Newfangled Science?"
Next in thread: Anders Sandberg: "Re: What's So New in a Newfangled Science?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

For such a review focusing on the issues and avoiding all hype, see Scott
Aaronson,University of California Berkeley - Book Review: A New Kind of
Science
http://lanl.arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0206/0206089.pdf

- Jef
www.jefallbright.com

> Personally I wish people could get past their pique at the apparent
> arrogance in Wolfram's writing and focus on the ideas, but I don't think
> such a review would be as widely read.
>
> Hal
>

Next message: spike66: "Re: Practical Cosmology Symposium--Five Papers Now Online"
Previous message: Emlyn O'regan: "RE: Nothing (was: RE: Changing One's Mind)"
In reply to: Hal Finney: "Re: What's So New in a Newfangled Science?"
Next in thread: Anders Sandberg: "Re: What's So New in a Newfangled Science?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:14:51 MST