From: Smigrodzki, Rafal (SmigrodzkiR@msx.upmc.edu)
Date: Sun Jun 16 2002 - 18:44:20 MDT
Harvey Newstrom [mailto:mail@HarveyNewstrom.com] wrote:
So now that we're all agreed, we don't have to go through this whole
argument again. There's no point in debating whether anything is 100%
provable, or whether logic and science are valid methods or not. The
proposed course of action for the future is the same either way.
That is what I wanted to know. If the proposed course of action is the
same either way, this whole debate becomes moot. We continue on as we
always have, do our best, and try to get it right if we can. There
really is no major flaw in logic or science, or major call for us to
change our ways to something different instead.
### I couldn't speak for the other participants in this thread but yes, as I
see it you are exactly right.
Rafal
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:14:50 MST