SCIENCE: The Universe as a Computer

From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@aeiveos.com)
Date: Mon Jun 03 2002 - 16:21:11 MDT

• Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Rand vs Randites, was Re: what, not an extropian?"
• Previous message: Max More: "Re: Longevity and Ayn Anti-Venom"
• Next in thread: Colin Hales: "RE: SCIENCE: The Universe as a Computer"
• Reply: Colin Hales: "RE: SCIENCE: The Universe as a Computer"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Nature Science Update has this article

http://www.nature.com/nsu/020527/020527-16.html

"Universe is a computer", commenting on Seth Lloyd's article

> Lloyd, S. Computational capacity of the Universe.
> Physical Review Letters, 88, 237901, (2002).
(surely a citation error....)

But seems to point to a variant on this preprint:

Computational capacity of the universe
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0110141

which we seem to have missed (slap the ruler on our collective
pointy hats) since it was submitted last October...

Interesting that its only now getting spin in conjunction
with Wolfram's recent book.

Robert

• Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Rand vs Randites, was Re: what, not an extropian?"
• Previous message: Max More: "Re: Longevity and Ayn Anti-Venom"
• Next in thread: Colin Hales: "RE: SCIENCE: The Universe as a Computer"
• Reply: Colin Hales: "RE: SCIENCE: The Universe as a Computer"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:14:34 MST