From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Fri May 31 2002 - 21:43:57 MDT
I realized it could just be accenting syllables when I wrote
that, dear Mikey. But, since the entire tenor is different than
I thought existed between spike and I, I decided I better check
everything. So I asked. After all the remark itself was a bit
of a behind-the-back slap that I didn't expect.
Nice of you to butt in as always.
- samantha
Mike Lorrey wrote:
> Samantha Atkins wrote:
>
>>spike66 wrote:
>>
>>>are different than many, and its pointless as all hell. like you,
>>>i dont want to be associated with some of the views posted
>>>on extropians. such as samantha's, HOly schlaMOly. {8^D
>>>
>>What, exactly, is that supposed to mean? Are the capitilized
>>characters significant or what? Up to this point, on list and
>>off, I thought we had mutual respect even if not agreement on
>>several points. Now I am not so sure. So, since you
>>accidentally posted this, please show me you are not two-faced
>>by coming clean.
>>
>
> Oh, WOW. HO, My gOd! Samantha, talk about jumping to conclusions from
> ones own preferred glass color. To me, Spike's comment was emphasising
> the syllables which one emphasises when saying 'holy schlamoly', but it
> seems you took offense at him highlighting the letters H, O, M, O, as if
> it is some attack on your sexual preference.
>
> As I said about another story someone posted the other day, sometimes,
> Samantha, a cigar is just a cigar.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:14:32 MST