From: Harvey Newstrom (mail@HarveyNewstrom.com)
Date: Sun May 26 2002 - 06:19:46 MDT
On Sunday, May 26, 2002, at 04:30 am, Reason wrote:
> Hmm. Well I'm not in the devaluation boat (or any sort of valuation
> boat). I
> was trying to separately out the more interesting factual choices (where
> society draws the line) as opposed to the less interesting ethical
> choices
> (less interesting to me because most people can't discuss these things
> rationally, and the final answer seems like a roll of the dice).
Deja Vu! I've been through this before with someone else!
Can you specifically state your viewpoints now? Have we all merely
misunderstood your position? Are you NOT claiming that genders or races
be valued differently, or that violence toward races or infants is
acceptable behavior?
It seems strange that we have had this huge argument, but all the people
who seemed to be arguing this position have melted away. I guess we all
imagined that these positions were being presented on this list. They
never existed, no one ever proposed them, and there are no proponents of
them. Samantha was sickened by nothing, Gina offended my nothing, and I
have been arguing with nobody.
But why do such issues keep recurring over and over?
-- Harvey Newstrom, CISSP <www.HarveyNewstrom.com> Principal Security Consultant <www.Newstaff.com>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:14:22 MST