From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Tue May 21 2002 - 00:44:29 MDT
Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2002, Harvey Newstrom wrote:
>
>
>>If they get virtually all of their business from people who don't know
>>it, and virtually none from people who understand the contract,
>>something seems wrong. There must be some legal limit to contracts
>>
>
> Why? You have to deal with the consequences of the decisions you do.
>
Are you claiming that I have to not only know my own business
and area of expertise but also be an expert shyster and on top
of all current case law to boot and that if I am not it is my
own damn fault if I get taken to the cleaners?
> As you mentioned, most people do not care enough to find out they've been
> swindled. There are always more ethical alternatives around, some of them
> -- omg -- even for pay. By continue to do business with someone who
> defaulted on the contract (their every own terms of usage) you're clearly
> advertising the fact that you're either clueless, or don't mind being
> cheated.
>
Or you have no workable alternative.
- samantha
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:14:14 MST