From: Natasha Vita-More (natasha@natasha.cc)
Date: Mon May 20 2002 - 21:45:47 MDT
Oh dear. I just read Olga's post.
Technotranscendence, while I sympathize with your efforts, do you need to
argue the relevance of art to anyone who has little value for "art" -- a
highly necessary and influential thinking application of the brain's
functions?
Art stands on its own value depicting human effort and ability to "imitate,
supplement, alter, or counteract the work of nature." All disciplines, at
their highest value, become art.
Art!
Natasha
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:14:14 MST