Re: singularity logic loop

From: Eugen Leitl (eugen@leitl.org)
Date: Sun Apr 28 2002 - 02:26:28 MDT


On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Phil Osborn wrote:

> smart enuf to do the odds. Anyway, at some point, I began to ask
> myself if maybe this wasn't actually true, and I figured out a
> sure-fire test, which is the follo fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
> fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
 
Would you mind repeating it? I only get fnord here.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:13:40 MST