Re: singularity logic loop

From: spike66 (spike66@attbi.com)
Date: Wed Apr 24 2002 - 09:02:32 MDT

• Next message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Definitions of friendliness? (was singularity loop logic)"
• Previous message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Immortality and Personal Finance"
• In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: singularity logic loop"
• Next in thread: Samantha Atkins: "Re: singularity logic loop"
• Reply: Samantha Atkins: "Re: singularity logic loop"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Samantha Atkins wrote:

> I see no reason that the SI would not let these researchers, and all
> others who would not be damaged by knowing, in on the truth.

So Eliezer and his droogies have all along been *in on it?*

I suddenly feel so... Truman.

{8^D

spike

• Next message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Definitions of friendliness? (was singularity loop logic)"
• Previous message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Immortality and Personal Finance"
• In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: singularity logic loop"
• Next in thread: Samantha Atkins: "Re: singularity logic loop"
• Reply: Samantha Atkins: "Re: singularity logic loop"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:13:38 MST