Re: Definitions of friendliness? (was singularity loop logic)

From: Eugen Leitl (eugen@leitl.org)
Date: Wed Apr 24 2002 - 02:36:18 MDT

• Next message: Eugen Leitl: "RE: singularity logic loop"
• Previous message: Lee Corbin: "Definitions of friendliness? (was singularity loop logic)"
• In reply to: Lee Corbin: "Definitions of friendliness? (was singularity loop logic)"
• Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Definitions of friendliness? (was singularity loop logic)"
• Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Definitions of friendliness? (was singularity loop logic)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Lee Corbin wrote:

> Eliezer wrote
> > - to my way of thinking, this violates Friendliness.
>
> Why in the world? I would deeply hope that it would be so
> considerate! *Everyone* would be better off uploaded (if

Thanks for again demonstrating that consensus on Friendliness metric does
not exist (apparently, it needs reminding). Not to mention that singletons
are unphysical, but that will have to wait for another post.

• Next message: Eugen Leitl: "RE: singularity logic loop"
• Previous message: Lee Corbin: "Definitions of friendliness? (was singularity loop logic)"
• In reply to: Lee Corbin: "Definitions of friendliness? (was singularity loop logic)"
• Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Definitions of friendliness? (was singularity loop logic)"
• Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Definitions of friendliness? (was singularity loop logic)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:13:38 MST