From: Mike Lorrey (mlorrey@datamann.com)
Date: Mon Apr 22 2002 - 13:23:56 MDT
"Michael M. Butler" wrote:
>
> Mike Lorrey wrote:
> > Yes, though thats still a rather loose definition. Terrorism is to
> > attack unarmed civilians who are not engaged in action against you, do
> > not provide sanctuary or support to those engaged in action against you.
> > This is its definition under the laws of war. Note that this leaves open
> > a rather wide segment of the civilians who are legitimate targets of
> > force: those who engage in violence against you, or provide sanctuary or
> > support to those who do.
>
> Have you a hard cite for that one? It would indeed appear to redefine some
> activities currently labeled terrorism by TPTB here in USA...
Google on "Laws of War" and/or "Geneva Conventions"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:13:37 MST