RE: bumperstatements

From: Natasha Vita-More (natasha@natasha.cc)
Date: Tue Apr 16 2002 - 08:27:12 MDT

• Next message: Eugen Leitl: "META: Re: POLITICS: Re: grim prospects"
• Previous message: Damien Broderick: "RE: Jesus and the Singularity"
• In reply to: Emlyn O'regan: "RE: bumperstatements"
• Next in thread: Mike Lorrey: "Re: bumperstatements"
• Reply: Mike Lorrey: "Re: bumperstatements"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 09:11 AM 4/16/02 +0930, Emlyn wrote:

>So how about
>"Back off - I've got stand-by"
>
>A bit obscure?

It's good, even if obscure -:)

• Next message: Eugen Leitl: "META: Re: POLITICS: Re: grim prospects"
• Previous message: Damien Broderick: "RE: Jesus and the Singularity"
• In reply to: Emlyn O'regan: "RE: bumperstatements"
• Next in thread: Mike Lorrey: "Re: bumperstatements"
• Reply: Mike Lorrey: "Re: bumperstatements"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:13:33 MST