Re: Illegal evidence, was grim prospects

From: Harvey Newstrom (mail@HarveyNewstrom.com)
Date: Sat Apr 13 2002 - 11:27:23 MDT

• Next message: John K Clark: "Is the Universe really accelerating?"
• Previous message: Harvey Newstrom: "Re: CO2: Los Alamos perfects extraction process..."
• In reply to: Smigrodzki, Rafal: "RE: Illegal evidence, was grim prospects"
• Next in thread: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Illegal evidence, was grim prospects"
• Reply: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Illegal evidence, was grim prospects"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> ### Down with privacy! Long live accountability!

This is a false dichotomy. A good system can provide both.

• Next message: John K Clark: "Is the Universe really accelerating?"
• Previous message: Harvey Newstrom: "Re: CO2: Los Alamos perfects extraction process..."
• In reply to: Smigrodzki, Rafal: "RE: Illegal evidence, was grim prospects"
• Next in thread: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Illegal evidence, was grim prospects"
• Reply: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Illegal evidence, was grim prospects"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:13:29 MST