From: CurtAdams@aol.com
Date: Fri Apr 12 2002 - 12:33:16 MDT
In a message dated 4/12/02 9:04:17, talon57@well.com writes:
>I did not say it was okay to kill an unarmed reporter, I said it
>was okay to kill anyone (including reporters) who violate a closed
>military zone.
Why is being a "closed military zone" of any ethical relevance?
If the Chinese declared their re-education camps "closed military
zones" should we stop investigating them? Is that any ethical
(as opposed to practical) reason to stop? The Israeli army lacks
the ethical credibility to be allowed to do what it wishes without
some sort of accountability.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:13:27 MST