From: CurtAdams@aol.com
Date: Wed Apr 10 2002 - 15:27:25 MDT
In a message dated 4/10/02 10:39:40, talon57@well.com writes:
>Reporters get soldiers killed all the time, usually by giving their
>position away. The fact they were were not trying to cause harm is
>irrelevant. Their very presence causes harm.
>
>At the very least they can be considered spies.
If you do a cost-benefit analysis to the world as a whole, it's going to come
out overwhelmingly
in favor of the press. How many soldiers die as a result of press? Not many
in any current
Westeern society, not manny soldiers die, period, and certainly in only a
small minority could
press activity even be partly at fault. OTOH
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:13:23 MST