Re: [MURG] meets [POLITICS]

From: Eugen Leitl (eugen@leitl.org)
Date: Mon Apr 08 2002 - 00:25:58 MDT


On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Adrian Tymes wrote:

> > People generally don't run task manager to watch what is consuming the
> > CPU time.
>
> True. It's more common to turn off various things until the computer
> starts behaving again.

The hidden assumption here is that you can trust what the task manager is
displaying you. That's a lot to ask for, as the task manager is just a
program, and even current rootkits patch the binaries or exchange them to
not show up in the task list.
 
> After a short, but very noticeable, delay to take care of any current
> tasks. Seen it on the other @home clients.

None of current @home clients is designed to be stealthy. You might want
to look at Folding@HOME client's priority. Notice that is uses graphics
excessively. It's not designed to restrict itself to nonswappable memory.

I don't see my console based Folding@HOME client under Linux (other than
by 98% nice CPU bar), and it doesn't try to be stealthy either.
 
[snip]



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:13:19 MST