From: Max More (max@maxmore.com)
Date: Fri Apr 05 2002 - 02:49:51 MST
At 01:31 AM 4/5/2002 -0500, Harvey wrote:
>On Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 11:59 PM, dwayne wrote:
>
>>Damien Broderick wrote:
>>>
>>>At 08:40 AM 4/5/02 +1000, dwayne wrote:
>>>Dwayne, you're so bad.
>>
>>Yes, but of course when I'm bad I'm better.
>
>Why are we so good at being bad and so bad at being good?
I've found that it's not so good when I'm bad, and not so bad when I'm good.
Extropians aim to get better at being "bad" when that's good, while getting
worse at being "good" when that's bad.
It's too bad that's what good is sometimes thought to be bad.
Max
_______________________________________________________
Max More, Ph.D.
max@maxmore.com or more@extropy.org
http://www.maxmore.com
Strategic Philosopher
President, Extropy Institute. http://www.extropy.org <more@extropy.org>
________________________________________________________________
Director of Content Solutions, ManyWorlds Inc.: http://www.manyworlds.com
--- Thought leadership in the innovation economy
m.more@manyworlds.com
_______________________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:13:15 MST