From: CurtAdams@aol.com
Date: Wed Apr 03 2002 - 17:18:03 MST
In a message dated 4/3/02 14:17:07, jacques@dtext.com writes:
>But as I said, to me, biological evolution in the sense of gene
>selection is important to understand what we ARE; not to understand
>what we will be.
That's not at odds with my position. I'm arguing that human nature wil
not remain fixed, even over relatively short time scales, regardless of
what we do. Nothing inconsistent with interest in what were are and how
we got this way. I was disagreeing with several assertions in your post,
such as that since human nature has remained relatively stable over
historical times it isn't going to change substantially in the near future.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:13:14 MST