QM: Why the Copenhagen Interpretation's Indeterminism is Not Empirical

From: Technotranscendence (neptune@mars.superlink.net)
Date: Wed Mar 27 2002 - 18:51:11 MST

• Next message: Damien Broderick: "Freeman Dyson on John Polkinghorne on science & future"
• Previous message: Ziana Astralos: "Re: META: Virus Redux"
• Next in thread: Hal Finney: "Re: QM: Why the Copenhagen Interpretation's Indeterminism is Not Empirical"
• Maybe reply: Hal Finney: "Re: QM: Why the Copenhagen Interpretation's Indeterminism is Not Empirical"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

See http://home.mmcable.com/cogans/chris/Indeterminism_problem.htm

I know this subject has been beaten to death, ressurected and beaten
back to death again, here and elsewhere numerous times, but since
quantum physics is again under discussion here, though more from an
applications perspective, I thought some of you might find this article
of interest.

Enjoy!

Dan
http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/

• Next message: Damien Broderick: "Freeman Dyson on John Polkinghorne on science & future"
• Previous message: Ziana Astralos: "Re: META: Virus Redux"
• Next in thread: Hal Finney: "Re: QM: Why the Copenhagen Interpretation's Indeterminism is Not Empirical"
• Maybe reply: Hal Finney: "Re: QM: Why the Copenhagen Interpretation's Indeterminism is Not Empirical"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:13:07 MST