From: John Grigg (starman2100@lycos.com)
Date: Sat Mar 02 2002 - 03:15:51 MST
At 12:57 AM 3/1/02 -0900, you wrote:
>On Fri, 01 Mar 2002 15:25:55
>Damien Broderick wrote:
> >I can't find the rude bits. Are there rude bits? Maybe they're all tucked
> >away inside.
> >
> >Damien Broderick
> >[it would be awful not to have the rude bits]
>
>Damien, why would Natasha want rude comments in her website?
Richard Hack wrote:
He said rude "bits". not comments! He means what you mean!
(end)
He really did? Wow! Damien once again has confused me with his incomprehensible aussie slang! Hey Richard, did the happy face at the bottom of my post clue you in to anything?? : )
> And do you really think she hid them away somewhere hard to find?? I
> never even thought Australians enjoyed rudeness! You all seem like such
> nice people.
you wrote:
You haven't been following Russell Crowe's antics lately, eh? Do'oh! I
forgot - he's a New Zealander! I read on Usenet the Australian press are
now referring to him as such, having disowned him :-}
(end)
I'm more interested in his films, actually. I do admit to having heard he can be very blunt with people. Do you know if he has attacked anyone's car with a golf club yet? He and Jack need to hang out together more!
>In my case I think what we needed was more information about the huge
>nanopowered super sex organs these bodies could sport!! Or perhaps they
>don't even have sex organs, because they might just link up their nervous
>systems with medical nanotech. It would give a whole new meaning to
>"baby, come over here and hold my hand."
>
>I bet that's what Natasha had in mind!
>
>best wishes,
>
>John : )
>
you wrote:
Haven't see it yet, but I bet it looks better than Hans Moravec's "bush" :-}
(end)
GROAN!!!
you wrote:
BTW, just saw Natasha' s picture on her site - now that's a Transhuman
babe! Lucky Max!
(end)
I have to admit the picture of Natasha blew me away, too. My roommate actually thought I was looking at a porn site! lol! To be honest, many women in their twenties don't have a body that fit and beautiful. So if Britney Spears wants to keep her ass, she better have Natasha as her trainer! I agree with you that for (multiple) reasons regarding Natasha, Max is a very lucky man.
"Transhuman babe" is such an interesting term... Should it be the Extropy Institute equivalent to being a Playboy Playmate? And will there be a tasteful "Transhuman babe" centerfold pic for each issue of Extropy online? LOL!!
you wrote:
(Didn't forget you either, Amara - saw your picture with the Terenzi
interview! And Fiorella is one of my top five favorite babes - I just
adore brilliant, beautiful babes!)
(end)
I also adore brilliant AND beautiful babes!! : ) But what if a woman is only brilliant?? : ( Within fifty years or less, hopefully all women will get to have both incredible qualities. I'll really never get a date then!! lol
Actually, right now I'm dating a gal who is pretty incredible. But sadly, she has a bunch of Klingons for brothers who want to meet me in person to engage in ritual combat(ritual wrestling match!). I guess there is a biological basis for this behavior somehow!
Finally, wait till you look at a picture of Gina "Nanogirl" Miller! But don't waste your time, she's married now to a top nanotech researcher!
best wishes,
John
2,000,000,000 Web Pages--you only need 1. Save time with My Lycos.
http://my.lycos.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:12:43 MST