Re: Overpopulation (was Re: Exowombs & AGING: a few billion toomany)

From: Eugene Leitl (Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Fri Feb 22 2002 - 14:08:23 MST


On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Damien R. Sullivan wrote:

> What are you smoking? Did you read my parathesis? Any city worth the

Yes. You listed several cities densities. A continent is not a city,
though. And most assuredly not the planet, where there is nowhere to leech
from.

> name today has a much higher density than 1000/km^2. That's including
> transportation (and park) space. The city isn't producing its own food,
> of course. But then that was my point in responding to James; I was

Of course.

> skeptical of 2 billion people supported by North America. For just
> living space it's easy.

Yes, but just living space buys you nothing. I agree with your sentiment,
but I would have stated it far more violently. Current level of
technology, even with massive lifestyle changes is incompatible with
widespread areas with that density.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:12:35 MST