RE: so few true iconoclasts....

From: Randy Smith (randysmith101@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 14 2002 - 09:51:21 MST


I think the article states that the author is not a creationist, true?

>From: "Smigrodzki, Rafal" <SmigrodzkiR@msx.upmc.edu>
>Reply-To: extropians@extropy.org
>To: "'extropians@extropy.org'" <extropians@extropy.org>
>Subject: RE: so few true iconoclasts....
>Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:43:34 -0500
>
>
>From: John Thomas [mailto:jwthomas@sonic.net]
>
>
>"Iconoclasm" might be one word to describe this:
>http://frontpagemag.com/columnists/locke/2001/locke08-20-01.htm
>
>
>### I'd say it's "nothing new in the Creationist camp" - the same,
>hundred-times-refuted objections, little carefully selected pieces of
>half-truth. Evolution is alive and kicking, no doubts about it.
>
>Rafal

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:11:38 MST