Re: after all that bullshit about ad hominems, here we go again?(was Re: some U.S. observations and notes)

From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Tue Dec 25 2001 - 00:52:40 MST

• Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: the spike, but not as we know it, Jim"
• Previous message: John Clark: "Re: One humanity, all in the same boat"
• In reply to: Phil Osborn: "Re: after all that bullshit about ad hominems, here we go again? (was Re: some U.S. observations and notes)"
• Next in thread: Spike Jones: "Re: some U.S. observations and notes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Phil Osborn wrote:
>
> Oh gosh, another series of sexist diatribes that I missed out on! Darn. Well, I just can't stand to see only the women getting away with blatant sexism, and poor Moloy stuck defending objectivity..
>

<SPUTTER>

Can we do something other (and hopefully more fruitful) than
deciding how tongue-in-cheek we can be before someone takes our
blarney seriously and decides we are really out to lunch?
What? You mean you *were* serious? <oops>

- samantha

• Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: the spike, but not as we know it, Jim"
• Previous message: John Clark: "Re: One humanity, all in the same boat"
• In reply to: Phil Osborn: "Re: after all that bullshit about ad hominems, here we go again? (was Re: some U.S. observations and notes)"
• Next in thread: Spike Jones: "Re: some U.S. observations and notes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:12:48 MST