Re: New website: The Simulation Argument

From: Nick Bostrom (nick@nickbostrom.com)
Date: Sat Dec 08 2001 - 15:25:15 MST


Eugene wrote:

>On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, G.P. wrote:
>
> > The logic as I understand it is: if humanity will develop and exploit
> > the resources to run simulations containing conscious humans, then the
> > number of conscious humans living in simulations is a very high
> > fraction of the total number of conscious humans. Consequently the
> > probability that I live in a simulation is high.
>
>Two words: anthropic effect. This why probability arguments are not valid.

That's a little too quick for me. Would you spell out your objection?

Nick Bostrom
Department of Philosophy, Yale University
New Haven, CT 06520 | Phone: (203) 432-1663 | Fax: (203) 432-7950
Homepage: http://www.nickbostrom.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:12:24 MST