From: Emlyn O'regan (oregan.emlyn@healthsolve.com.au)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2001 - 17:02:51 MST
>as a Parfitian which
>would you prefer: a) To live another say 50 years (a "normal" life
span), or
>b) die tomorrow and be replaced by an identical copy that will 1000
years?
>(Obviously, for some functionalist at least the choice is simply
whether to
>live 50 or 1000 years. I have phrased the question so as not to beg the
>question against Parfitians et. al). I think most of us, no matter
where we
>fall on the continuum you outline would take b, although I would be
curious
>to hear from those that would take a.
I've got to agree with Damien on this one. 50 years sounds better than dying
tomorrow.
Why? Because I have a big attachment to "me", whatever that is, but as to
patterns of atoms and/or information which are strongly or even exactly
like me? I couldn't care less. Well, I'd probably actually care a bit about
most other people out there (I really do like people a lot), but there are
limits.
Emlyn
***************************************************************************
Confidentiality: The contents of this email are confidential and are
intended only for the named recipient. If the reader of this e-mail is not
the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any use, reproduction,
disclosure or distribution of the information contained in the e-mail is
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to us
immediately and delete the document.
Viruses: Any loss/damage incurred by using this material is not the sender's
responsibility. Our entire liability will be limited to resupplying the
material. No warranty is made that this material is free from computer virus
or other defect.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:12:23 MST