From: Adrian `Guru Zeb` Harper (guruzeb@blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Mon Sep 17 2001 - 08:52:46 MDT
At 02:55 17/09/01, you wrote:
>At 18:49 16/09/01, you wrote:
>>From: "Adrian `Guru Zeb` Harper" <guruzeb@blueyonder.co.uk>
>> > How could we guarantee that such an AI would not become infected with the
>> > same religious viral memes that afflict so
>> > many humans.
>>
>>An explanation of why AI is not susceptible to this affliction can be found
>>here:
>>The Myth of The Monstrous Machine
>>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Virtropy/message/2949
>Thanks for the link JR but i can't access it since am not a member of the
>E-group. If you could post the article or if you don't want to spam up the
>list
>mail it to me. i appreciate it.
Don't usually repost over my own msg's. Just to say i do not accept the
proposition
of the Monstrous Machine. It is truly a myth. I cannot image any
circumstances ( except
a deliberate attempt to create a "AI@Risk" ) under which AI's would be
manufactured
without practical means of control, even something as simple as a "kill
switch". I very much
expect the first AI's to be deliberately isolated from network and coms
access. Essentially
to be "raised" in solitary confinement, having contact only with the
researchers involved in
the project. I expect this kind of isolation to continue until practical
methods are found to
guarantee legal AI's benevolence, and co-operation.
Zeb
"FURIOUS GREEN DREAMS, LAY SLEEPING IN STATE,
BUT SOON THE GREAT JELLY SHALL RISE FROM THE
DEPTHS,
AND ALL THOSE WHO MOCKED SHALL KNOW THEIR FATE
IS SEALED"
Guru Zeb,
Hacienda,
Manchester, 1989
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:10:45 MST