Re: TERRORISM: Seriousness and potential strategies

From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Sun Sep 16 2001 - 05:08:05 MDT


Barbara Lamar wrote:
>
> Miriam English wrote:
>
> >
> > If the flying devices were as small as seagulls or hawks and were able to
> > land and take off again (this is actually easier on mountainsides than on
> > flat ground) then they would be able to look across at people from
> > neighboring hillsides and see their faces.
>
> If they were able to land it would change everything, especially if they
> could somehow be disguised to blend in with the landscape. They wouldn't
> necessarily have to take off again. How small could you get a video camera,
> power source and transmitter that could communicate either with a
> high-flying aircraft, balloon, or a satellite?

Try checking out "smart dust" for one. It probably isn't ready
for prime time yet though.

http://robotics.eecs.berkeley.edu/~pister/SmartDust/

- samantha



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:10:42 MST