From: Chen Yixiong, Eric (cyixiong@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Sep 15 2001 - 20:52:41 MDT
-----Original Message-----
From: G Pantos [mailto:gop6@home.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 10:54 PM
To: time-space@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [time-space] Fw: [antigrav] a war
I concur with this view.. I don't know about anybody else but I'm getting
worn out with all this so I will let somebody else voice his opinion which
is actually better than I could.. I'm sure there is no shortage of opinions
just check out other e-groups..
----- Original Message -----
From: Russ Jones
To: greenglow@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 7:57 PM
Subject: RE: [antigrav] a war
Perhaps the money that would be used for such a war, with no clear goals,
would be better spent tending to the needs of the victims, rebuilding the
destroyed infrastructure, and providing all commercial airline pilots and
co-pilots with sidearms and anti-terrorist training to prevent the use of
this strategy from succeeding in the future?
How easy it is to go over-board planning a retaliation, when it is the
American tax-payers that would be footing the bill for fighting such a
war with no clear-cut objectives, slim possibilities of winning quickly,
and certainly further destabilizing the remaining security of our nation.
What in God's name would a war now ever hope to accomplish for the US?
We already have a tremendous tax-burden to cover the cost of defending
the nation from all threats INCLUDING terrorism. Can such a proposed
war be considered as a defensive measure? I think not.
My deepest respect goes out to the lost souls of the plane that crashed
in PA, for it was those people who knew they had to fight in the moment
of the encounter. They chose to risk their lives to save others, and
they did not allow themselves to be subdued by the threat of personal
injury from five lousy terrorists. I hope everyone remembers the
lesson taught us by the passengers of the flight that crashed in PA.
They fought back. Going to war now is not exactly fighting back, it
seems more like we are simply taking revenge....revenge which, according
to the same God the administration believes in and worships, is only
reserved for the Lord to take.
It seems such a move only plays into the hands of the terrorists.
If someone was smart-enough to plan these acts of terrorism, do we
not think they were smart-enough to expect some kind of retaliation
or anticipate our response? If we go to war, we are likely playing
right into their hands.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anna [mailto:pantheon@ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 7:59 PM
> To: Existence@yahoogroups.com; morphic@topica.com
> Subject: [antigrav] a war
>
>
> From Psycho-history:
>
> "MSNBC just reported it had information that the Bush administration
> is planning on launching a full-scale war against Afghanistan
> including invasion troops, a war that they conclude might last years.
> The knives and box-cutters of the terrorists may produce additional
> tens of thousands of sacrificial victims. The country seems fully
> behind any invasion and what one TV interviewer termed "collateral
> damage."
>
>
>
>
>
> To Post a message, send it to: greenglow@eGroups.com
>
> To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
> greenglow-unsubscribe@eGroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
To Post a message, send it to: greenglow@eGroups.com
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: greenglow-unsubscribe@eGroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:10:41 MST