Re: Morality Is Relative

From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Mon Aug 27 2001 - 02:15:51 MDT

Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: A New Kind of Science"
Previous message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Paying for Schools (was: SOCIETY: Re: The privatization of public security)"
In reply to: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Morality Is Relative"
Next in thread: Russell Blackford: "Re: new to list"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

From: <Spudboy100@aol.com>
> Then how come you haven't ploinked morality yet as a useless hypothesis?

'Cause morality is a subset of foolosofy.
Ploinking phoolosophy covers moralism and a whole bunch of useless isms.

©¿©¬

Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: A New Kind of Science"
Previous message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Paying for Schools (was: SOCIETY: Re: The privatization of public security)"
In reply to: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Morality Is Relative"
Next in thread: Russell Blackford: "Re: new to list"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:10:08 MST