From: John Clark (jonkc@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Sat Aug 04 2001 - 11:45:59 MDT
On July 17 I expressed skepticism over the "successful" test. I said
" many past tests were rigged (heaters on the warhead to strengthen
the IR signature etc) to make them look better than they actually were
but that didn't come out until years later."
This time it didn't take years, the warhead had a C band transceiver to
amplify the radar signal.
John K Clark jonkc@att.net
begin 666 Chicago Tribune Successful missile test had help.url
M6T1%1D%53%1=#0I"05-%55),/6AT=' Z+R]C:&EC86=O=')I8G5N92YC;VTO
M;F5W<R]N871I;VYW;W)L9"]C:&DM,#$P-S(X,#$S,&IU;#(X+G-T;W)Y/V-O
M;&P]8VAI)3)$;F5W<VYA=&EO;G=O<FQD)3)$:&5D#0H-"EM);G1E<FYE=%-H
M;W)T8W5T70T*55),/6AT=' Z+R]C:&EC86=O=')I8G5N92YC;VTO;F5W<R]N
M871I;VYW;W)L9"]C:&DM,#$P-S(X,#$S,&IU;#(X+G-T;W)Y/V-O;&P]8VAI
M)3)$;F5W<VYA=&EO;G=O<FQD)3)$:&5D#0I-;V1I9FEE9#TX,#@P,S$P1C!#
*,41#,3 Q,D(-"@``
`
end
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:09:26 MST