From: Robert Coyote (coyyote@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jul 09 2001 - 18:36:46 MDT
Don't forget the the us mail is not a government agency, its contracted.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Max" <mcomess@ucla.edu>
To: <extropians@tick.javien.com>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: extropians-digest V6 #188
> <snip>
>
> However, on this list, not less than Mr. Max More
> > himself has
> > expressed the desire to be able to temporarily turn
> > off his sex drive,
> > a desire I fully understand. It would be nice to be
> > free of the
> > whole darn tormenting thing.
> <snip>
>
> Hey, me too. I've wanted to do that since I was like 15.
>
> <snip>
>
> Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be attempting to
> bill E-mail users out of "alternative postage fees". Bill 602P will
> permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent surcharge on every
> e-mail delivered, by billing Internet Service Providers at source. The
> consumer would then be billed in turn by the ISP.
>
> "Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent this
> legislation from becoming law. The US Postal Service is claiming lost
> revenue, due to the proliferation of E-mail, is costing nearly
> $230,000,000 in revenue per year. You may have noticed their recent ad
> campaign: "There is nothing like a letter." Since the average person
> received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day in 1998, the cost of the
> typical individual would be an additional 50 cents a day - or over $180
> per year - above and beyond their regular Internet costs. Note that this
> would be money paid directly to the US Postal Service for a service they
> do not even provide. The whole point of the Internet is democracy and
> non-interference. You are already paying an exorbitant price for snail
> mail because of bureaucratic inefficiency. It currently takes up to 6
days
> for a letter to be delivered from coast to coast. If the US Postal
> Service is allowed to tinker with E-mail, it will mark the end of the
> "free" Internet in the United States. Congressional representative,
Tony
> Schnell (R) has even suggested a "$20-$40 per month surcharge on all
> Internet service" above and beyond the governments proposed E-mail
> charges. Note that most of the major newspapers have ignored the story
> the only exception being the Washingtonian which called the idea of
> E-mail surcharge "a useful concept who's time has come" (March 6th, 1999
> Editorial). Do not sit by and watch your freedom erode away! Send this
> E-mail to EVERYONE on your list, and tell all your friends and relatives
> to write their congressional representative and say "NO" to Bill 602P.
> It will only take a few moments of your time and could very well be
> instrumental in killing a bill we do not want."
> <snip>
>
> Natasha, as far as I know, the "Bill 602P ", the one that proposes levying
a
> tax on email, is a hoax. I've seen this exact same text like a year ago,
it
> went around. Then a few days later there were several stories stating that
> this was a hoax.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:08:36 MST