From: Natasha Vita-More (natasha@natasha.cc)
Date: Sat Jun 30 2001 - 12:46:21 MDT
At 09:26 AM 6/30/01 -0700, Robert J. Bradbury wrote:
>Hmmmmm... "To be real is to be mortal"
>
>I thought to be real was to have mass or energy associated with
>oneself. Guess A. O. Scott & I went to different schools...
Okay, now I'm definitely going to see the film. Since, the storyline
message clearly sucks, I bet the direction, cinematography, acting, and the
film logo with title topography are fantastic.
Here again, we have another outdated and tiresome myth which must be
cracked wide open ( "to be real is to be mortal.") However, on the one
hand, I can understand "verifiable existence" as something folks can hold
onto for dear life. It's that verifiable existence 'thang. It's a strange
oxymoron that this myth is based on knowing what death is.
"To be real is to be alive."
Natasha
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:08:23 MST