Re: Stealth tech vs mobile phones

From: Brian D Williams (talon57@well.com)
Date: Wed Jun 13 2001 - 07:49:23 MDT


>From: Damien Broderick <d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au>

>http://www.smh.com.au/news/0106/12/world/world2.html

>"It's remarkable that a stealth system that cost 60 billion pounds
>to develop is beaten by 100,000 pound mobile phone technology," Mr
>Lloyd said. "It's almost impossible to disable a mobile phone
>network without bombing an entire country, whereas radar
>installations are often knocked out of action with a single bomb
>or missile."

There are more problems with this than I have time to mention....

How many battlefields are covered by complete cell networks for
starters....

In time of battle the GPS will be disabled....

This system could easily be confused by chaff, and or drones....

An for a big conclusion they're forgetting completely about active
ECM, an EA6-B Prowler can waste any cell network/electrical grid it
encounters, as probably can Mike Lorrey's ole EF-111's.

Brian

Member:
Extropy Institute, www.extropy.org
Adler Planetarium www.adlerplanetarium.org
Life Extension Foundation, www.lef.org
National Rifle Association, www.nra.org, 1.800.672.3888
Ameritech Data Center Chicago, IL, Local 134 I.B.E.W



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:08:06 MST