Re: Extropy a cult -- NOT. well, WHY NOT?

From: Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de
Date: Sat Jun 09 2001 - 03:39:28 MDT

• Next message: Pete McAlpine: "Re: free markets"
• Previous message: Neal Blaikie: "Re: supergoals"
• In reply to: Frank Prengel: "RE: Extropy a cult -- NOT. well, WHY NOT?"
• Next in thread: Frank Prengel: "RE: Extropy a cult -- NOT. well, WHY NOT?"
• Reply: Frank Prengel: "RE: Extropy a cult -- NOT. well, WHY NOT?"
• Reply: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Extropy a cult -- NOT. well, WHY NOT?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Frank Prengel wrote:

> No. Since the term "cult" already has a widely accepted negative
> meaning, it would just ruin *our* reputation.

Reputation? Which reputation?

• Next message: Pete McAlpine: "Re: free markets"
• Previous message: Neal Blaikie: "Re: supergoals"
• In reply to: Frank Prengel: "RE: Extropy a cult -- NOT. well, WHY NOT?"
• Next in thread: Frank Prengel: "RE: Extropy a cult -- NOT. well, WHY NOT?"
• Reply: Frank Prengel: "RE: Extropy a cult -- NOT. well, WHY NOT?"
• Reply: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Extropy a cult -- NOT. well, WHY NOT?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:08:02 MST