RE: Extropy a cult -- NOT. well, WHY NOT?

From: Frank Prengel (frankpr@web.de)
Date: Sat Jun 09 2001 - 00:15:10 MDT

Next message: Frank Prengel: "RE: Microsoft crit?"
Previous message: John Marlow: "Re: power"
In reply to: Spike Jones: "Re: Extropy a cult -- NOT. well, WHY NOT?"
Next in thread: Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de: "Re: Extropy a cult -- NOT. well, WHY NOT?"
Reply: Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de: "Re: Extropy a cult -- NOT. well, WHY NOT?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spike Jones
...
> cult that does not demand one's resources. Perhaps we could
> improve greatly the reputation of the term cult. spike

No. Since the term "cult" already has a widely accepted negative
meaning, it would just ruin *our* reputation.

Next message: Frank Prengel: "RE: Microsoft crit?"
Previous message: John Marlow: "Re: power"
In reply to: Spike Jones: "Re: Extropy a cult -- NOT. well, WHY NOT?"
Next in thread: Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de: "Re: Extropy a cult -- NOT. well, WHY NOT?"
Reply: Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de: "Re: Extropy a cult -- NOT. well, WHY NOT?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:08:02 MST