From: Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de
Date: Fri Jun 01 2001 - 14:34:03 MDT
John Clark wrote:
> Questions:
> 1)Are you the original or the copy?
Who knows. Who cares. For sure you both are not the same
person, not anymore.
> 2)What experiment did you perform to make that determination?
If you look back after the fork, you're unaware of the other prong
of the fork. Just the same thing with the other guy. As to experiment,
I'll just whoever was not replicated, or ask for a recording.
> 3)Does that other fellow agree with you?
He might. He might not. It's strictly irrelevant. The probability
would be high he'd agree with you, as the diff is still negligible.
> 4) If it turns out you're the copy would there be any reason to be upset?
If it's a high-fidelity copy, with no hidden "features", no reason at all.
I think we would get along nicely, me and him.
______________________________________________________________
ICBMTO : N48 10'07'' E011 33'53'' http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204
57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:07:53 MST