From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Fri Jun 01 2001 - 00:44:04 MDT
James Rogers wrote:
>
> At 07:21 AM 5/30/2001 -0700, Brian D Williams wrote:
>
> >Everyone wants the benefits of nuclear power without the costs
> >involved. Placing the reactor as far away from the nearest
> >elementary school as possible is preferred. The 91.4-94.5 million
> >mile distance to the sun is acceptable for example. Locating a
> >nuclear plant outside a biosphere is a good idea.
> >
Hell, they can put it in my back yard if they want. The level
of radiation outside the perimeter fence is quite a bit lower
than what you get at just a bit higher altitude than sea-level.
> >I agree with the protests we are likely to see from the residents
> >of the state of Nevada on this issue.
>
What for?
> The Nevada nuclear disposal site isn't necessarily a good example, as the
> situation is more complex there. I am more familiar with the Nevada
> nuclear repository situation than most people and have discussed it in
> detail with Nevada politicians on more than one occasions. In theory, the
> Nevada repository is as good an idea as any.
>
And much better than most.
- samantha
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:07:52 MST