From: J Corbally (icorb@indigo.ie)
Date: Wed May 30 2001 - 11:49:09 MDT
>Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 21:41:10 -0700
>From: Lee Corbin <lcorbin@ricochet.net>
>Subject: Re: Murphy's Law corroborated
>In this time of trouble and despondency, we must not
>surrender to pessimism and defeat. We must always
>seek progress, and even try to learn which side our
>bread is buttered on.
>Murphy's Law is NOT an absolute!!!!!! We can turn
>the situation around by simply realizing that we have
>been buttering our bread on THE WRONG SIDE. Those
>of us **positively** oriented towards the future,
>and towards "up", now can seize upon the solution
>to this ancient dilemma. Henceforth shall we always
>butter our bread on the lower side instead of the upper.
>Lee Corbin
But then don't we end up with the same problem, just less grit?
Why not just simply use two slices of bread?
Now that they've proved Murphy's Law during the "fall" stage, what
experiment do we perform to determine if it operates at the "dumb git
knocked my bread off the table for starters" stage?
I'm telling you, it's questions like these that keep religion in
business.... :)
James...
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and
crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures
to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid."
-Q, Star Trek:TNG episode 'Q Who'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:07:51 MST