Re: AI Information Theory Rules

From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Sun Mar 25 2001 - 09:08:34 MST

• Next message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: [Forbes] "Bill and Steve couldn't have planned it better..."]"
• Previous message: Jim Fehlinger: "Re: A belated addition to the Science/Religion thread"
• In reply to: Zero Powers: "Re: AI Information Theory Rules"
• Next in thread: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Emulation vs. Simulation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I didn't cite it or publicize it either.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Zero Powers" <zero_powers@hotmail.com>
To: <extropians@extropy.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 12:33 AM
Subject: Re: AI Information Theory Rules

> >From: "J. R. Molloy" <jr@shasta.com>
>
> <snip>
>
> >Article submitted to The Skeptical Inquirer. This web version is
intended
> >for pre-publication comment and criticism; please do not cite or
publicize
> >it without permission.
>
> Curious. Did you get permission?
>
> -Zero

• Next message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: [Forbes] "Bill and Steve couldn't have planned it better..."]"
• Previous message: Jim Fehlinger: "Re: A belated addition to the Science/Religion thread"
• In reply to: Zero Powers: "Re: AI Information Theory Rules"
• Next in thread: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Emulation vs. Simulation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:06:40 MST