From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Thu Mar 15 2001 - 21:59:57 MST
At 08:37 PM 15/03/01 -0800, Robert wrote:
>you can assign a real "cost" to losing energy
>(due to photon spreading due the inverse square law affecting
>the strength of signals being transmitted -- photons you can't
>receive with your "detector" are lost energy/matter) and the actual
>"matter" lost due to ablation
Redundancy. Redundancy. Redundancy. Let me say it again. Redundancy.
Cost goes up, true.
Damien Broderick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:06:24 MST