Re: Eliezer on Science versus Religion

From: Brian D Williams (talon57@well.com)
Date: Fri Mar 09 2001 - 07:52:41 MST


From: Samantha Atkins <samantha@objectent.com>

>Frankly, you have little business claiming that you know what is
>and is not a part of the truth so vigorously that you disown all
>spirituality in one fell swoop. One of the inaccessible truths is
>the creation of a working vision that unites the hopes and dreams
>of a people. Religions, for good an ill are much more advanced in
>that work than science is.

Even a simpleton can see the logic and advantage behind Pascal's
wager. It is only by offering life-after-death that most religions
hold their sway.

This hardly makes them advanced.
  

>Religion is running scared? Really? Then why are the numbers of
>religious holding steady and even growing? Perhaps it is because
>of a bit more than just human stupidity and perversity. Perhaps
>the religions, even with all the blatantly wrong-headed and bad
>aspects, offer something that human beings strongly need/desire in
>their lives.

Hope, as defined above. A necessary sense of order. Lets not forget
the number of lottery players is also holding steady and probably
growing. I suggest for similar reasons.

Excellent post.

Brian

Member:
Extropy Institute, www.extropy.org
Adler Planetarium www.adlerplanetarium.org
Life Extension Foundation, www.lef.org
National Rifle Association, www.nra.org, 1.800.672.3888
Ameritech Data Center Chicago, IL, Local 134 I.B.E.W



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:06:16 MST